The 6149

Got my own row to hoe... 
Filed under

The Who

 

Whatever gets you through the night: I got dem ol' working late blues again...

Four nights in a row slamming away at the keyboard until at least 8:30pm. That's all I can stand and I can't stands no more! Time for a quick run to the local grocery to pull some 16 oz. Good Ol' Boys (as we call them in New Hampshire) off the shelf. 

Fortunately I am not alone. Just had a killer four-fer offered up by Spotify (replicated here with the help of Groove Shark):
Rave on, indeed.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Buddy Holly   Dedication   music   Nittty Gritty Dirt Band   riffs   The Who   Webb Pierce   work  
Posted by Judd 

Comments [4]

10 lbs. of Shit in an 8 lbs. Bag: A request for keeping music simple in 2010

"Too much of anything is too much for me. Too much and everything gets too much for me". - The Who

That is a line from the chorus of the song of the same name, "Too Much of Anything". Strangely enough, this was a bonus track off the 1995 reissue of the always-delivers Who album, "Who's Next". I say "strangely" for two reasons: one, the original version of  this album was nine songs of bow-down material and two, the fact that this song was a bonus track is fucking ironic. 

Too much of anything, indeed.

Why the hell did we need bonus tracks for this masterstroke? We didn't.  Pete & The Who made a brilliant, time-tested album that consisted of nine crowd pleasing, beer hoisting tunes. Nine. Here we go again...gorging ourselves on a great meal; bloated and reaching for the bicarbonates. Too much.  

I am fed up with "too much".  This year I am bringing it all back home: keeping everything as clean and simple as I need it to be. Near the end of 2009 I started to think about  clarity: eliminating variables; reducing clutter; focusing on less to enjoy more. 

I am not preaching purely simplicity for simple's sake. I am talking about clarity. Clarity doesn't sacrifice depth at simple's alter. "Focusing on less to enjoy more" is about clarity; lucidity. It is a concept that I am (forever forward) latching on to and enveloping myself in...including my music listening habits.  

I find myself gravitating to music that is much more lucid and clean of complexities...but, not lacking depth. Case in point: the Black Keys' "Chulahoma: The Songs of Junior Kimbrough".  

I am a Black Keys fan. They aren't always on my playlist, but I enjoy them from time to time. I did not own this album prior to my hearing it. Recently I was in a crowed and very loud bar. Nothing on the juke box was cutting through the din until I heard this album being played. Whoever was at the controls, decided that they need to play this album in its entirety. The groove was so pronounced and clear, it drowned out the noise in the room and filled all the spaces like a welcome mist. It felt calming and clean to me (even amongst all the clutter in the bar). I went out and bought it the next day. 

Lucidity, clarity and depth are full frontal on this set of six songs. The straightforward, two-fisted, Corsican Brother drum and guitar approach of Dan Auerbach and Patrick Carney lends itself to the clarity/simplicity + depth credo. There is no gratuitous flutes or overdubs or 16 track recordings...just two dudes, two instruments and a half a dozen of a simple bluesman's simple blues songs.  By simple I mean uncomplicated, not simpleton or unsophisticated or naive. No, these songs have depth and sagacity. 

Junior Kimbrough didn't make it on the blues scene until the 1990's, but he'd been cutting tracks as early as 1968. Junior was a Mississippi Hill Country native and legend. His blues is a hypnotic, sauntering groove that preaches a knowing simplicity and bares warts, proudly. This blues holds you in it's vibe and makes it hard to pull away. Every time I put it on, I know it is going to be a happening. I know I need to dedicate at least 20-30 minutes to it's gravity.

Here is a clip from Robert Palmer's brilliant expose on the raw, country blues: "Deep Blues". If you have not seen this, you MUST do so soon. More-so, read the book that preceded the movie. It is widely thought of as a classic in the genre; a career high for Robert Palmer in career filled with tall peaks.

</object>

(Junior also had the coolest album titles: "God Knows I Tried" & "Most Things Haven't Worked Out")

The Black Keys decided they needed to have a go at Junior's music. They gave it a richer, thicker sound...while keeping the ethos of it intact. They added to it without complicating it: less is more.  This is my fave track of the set:

What do you think? Does that feel like less is more to you?
_____

Nine songs. I like that. "Who's Next" wasn't the only great album with nine songs: "Let It Bleed" had nine songs, too.  That is my favorite album of all-time (a post for another day). Conversely, the Stone's 2005 Masterplunk, "A Bigger Bang", had 16(!) songs. Too much. 

I'd like to make a request of all music makers in 2010: please, don't try to cram ten pounds of shit in an eight pound bag.  Focus on reducing the clutter on your albums. Just because you can crowd16 songs on a CD doesn't mean you have to. I don't want more from you, I want less...and I want depth.

Excuse me while I go off to listen to some Charlie Patton...

_____

Regarding my personal thoughts on "too much": 

Too much of my time was being wasted worrying about things I manufactured or labeled as important.  Whether they were tasks or audacious (unattainable) goals or simply over thinking decisions or situations, the importance that I gave these things, put undue emphasis on them; one more thing I had to worry about. 

Here is a bit, from a larger mindmap (on my 2010 thoughts), on "reducing the clutter"

(download)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   2010   Black Keys   Blues   Brevity   Charley Patton   clutter   Junior Kimbrough   Less   More   Music   Rolling Stones   The Who   Tune Tags  
Posted by Judd 

Comments [3]

The CD Conundrum: Coasters or Collectors Items (What the hell should I do with my 1,000+ CDs?!?)

           
Click here to download:
The_CD_Conundrum_Coasters_or_C.zip (7913 KB)

Images of me unpacking and resorting my CD collection in my new London flat.

For those of you who do not know, I have been on my own World Tour of sorts as of late. In 1996 I lived in Newport, Rhode Island. In 1998 I moved up to Boston, where I met my wife (at a Tom Petty concert: find out how here). In 2002 we moved from Boston to Ft. Lauderdale, FL. In 2005, we made the big move around the globe to Sydney, Australia. This past September we relocated to London; ironically we now live on Sydney Street.

There are two things I have always traveled with no matter where I have rambled: my wife and my music collection.  Arguably these are the two most important things in my life; I couldn't do without either. Funny though, I have had a longer relationship with my music collection than my wife (she and I have been together over 10 years). My wife is not the jealous type, nor should ever have reason to be: I am an extremely loyal and dedicated man.  Which is why she shouldn't be surprised at my resistance to want to shed my vast collection of CDs.

My collection is 1,419 albums and box sets strong, consisting of both CDs and downloads. Recently I have converted back to vinyl (75 albums and growing) after decades of turning a deaf ear on their sonic brilliance. You can read through it all here in a live-list I created in a Google Doc: Judd's Juke Joint. I update this whenever I add to it. There is also a tab for my music related DVD material as well. 

Before I go any further, let me say this: as far as I am concerned my collection is 99% fat free. While I do think that size matters, quality is of most importance. 

As you can see in the spreadsheet I am in the process of highlighting which albums are physical CDs and which are downloaded bits and bytes. In my rough estimate, just under 1,110 of my collection is in CD format (including box sets).  That is a quite a load to haul around the world with me. I am thinking of making a move that scares the shit out of me: junking all of my physical CDs.

I am entertaining this thought for a few reasons:
  1. The sheer volume of CDs is cumbersome to move (around the world or otherwise)
  2. The majority of the CDs are on my two Macbooks. One of which is dedicated to just play music wirelessly around my flat.
  3. Because of #2, I hardly ever go to pull a CD off the racks to play it...I do only if I haven't already ripped it to my laptop
  4. My taste for vinyl.  
Why am I keeping all of these CDs?  I don't know, really.  Part of it is that it is tangible. I love seeing this tower of CDs everyday. A lot of work and play (and $$$) went into amassing this collection. Yes, I am emotionally attached to all of that polycarbonate plastic.

Conversely, I LOVE sifting through my vinyl collection and physically playing and flipping records...which is not easier nor is it more convenient. This of course, is because the sound and the experience from vinyl is worth the effort. The CD experience in comparison is shit. Having to get up and move across the floor to flip the record is exciting...I am actively participating in the music. Yes, I am now emotionally attached to all of that beautiful black lacquer.

So, what is poor music fan to do, 'cept to play some ol' rock and roll bands...899.html">heh heh.

Here is what I am thinking about doing if I decide to do anything at all:
  • Rip my entire physical CD collection to hard drives. I would put as much on my Macbooks as I can and the rest, in its combined CD and download glory, would be stored on external drives. I would back it up to as many as necessary until I feel secure. I could keep two on hand, get a safe deposit book for one and send one to my parents in New Hampshire for extra safe keeping.  And If all fails, I can bury one under a rock in Buxton, Maine for Red to dig up when he gets out of prison. 
  • I would then take all of the CD inserts/liner notes from each case and store them in a photo-album or something similar. This way I can have the info if I ever need it (this sounds like madness, doesn't it...).
  • I could hook up my external drive to the computer and play everything and anything through my wireless network set up throughout my flat. This is also very convenient for mobile-music
  • I would find some young, deserving music fans and donate my CD collection to them. I would divvy it up into assorted chunks so that the recipients would get a good mix of blues, soul, country, etc.  If I do this, I might have to forgo keeping the CD inserts. 
This would leave me with all digital files, vinyl and box sets (I would keep those in physical form). I think...think...I could live with that.  But how would I buy music?  

Let's use the last Bob Dylan album, "Together Through Life", as a test case. I bought that on vinyl and it came with a CD of the tunes sans CD packaging fanfare. This is best of both worlds: my preferred vinyl in 180 gram goodness and a CD to rip to my digital collection...and I get to give the CD to a deserving music fan/friend. If the album had come with a code for download that would have been just as good.

Anyhow, this is where I am at with my collection. I am not in a hurry to decide. All I know is that my collection will only grow.  While I LOVE the thought that it will get out of hand, it could get physically unmanageable as I move from place to place. 

Are any of you in the same situation? What are your thoughts? How have you/would you act on this...if at all? How do you buy your music? What are the holes in my potential plan?

Tune Tags

I chose "Sparks" by The Who as the tune tag for this post. This was the song playing in the movie Almost Famous when a young William Miller was flipping through the vinyl collection left to him (...to liberate him!) by his sister.


 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Bow-Down Post   CDs   Collection   DVDs   hard drive   Judd'sJukeJoint   Moving   riffs   The Who   Tom Petty   travel   Tune Tags   Vinyl  
Posted by Judd 

Comments [11]